PER CURIAM.
The issue presented is whether the State's introduction of and use in closing argument of testimony (such as law enforcement's recognition of defendant's nickname from a list of drug dealers and because they had previously arrested him, as well as a confidential informant's statement that he had bought drugs from defendant in the past) without...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
