PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found in direct criminal contempt of court. He contends that the court erred in finding that his isolated use of a profanity in court was sufficient to constitute a contempt, relying on Woods v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.