1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.3d
  4. 171 So.3d
  5. 171 So.3d 234 (2015)
 

PRIME GROUP, LLC v. ABBO

No. 4D15-1688.

171 So.3d 234 (2015)

PRIME GROUP, LLC, and its wholly owned affiliates and subsidiaries, Sheridan 46 Investment Group, LLC, Prime Group International, LLC, Prime Design Associates, LLC, Prime Auto Group, LLC, Prime Gencore, LLC, Prime Investors & Developers, LLC, d/b/a Prime Homebuilders and its wholly owned affiliates and subsidiaries, Portofino Builders South, Inc., Portofino Vista Builders, LLC, Prime Enterprises, LLC, Prime Commercial Developers, LLC, Prime Holdings Group, LLC, Prime Holdings Group II, LLC, Prime Holdings Group III, LLC, Prime Holdings Group V, LLC, Prime Homes at Portofino Meadows, LLC, Prime Homes at Sheridan Plaza, LLC, Prime Marketings and Sales, LLC, Prime General, LLC, Prime Homes of Florida, LLC, Prime Homebuilders, Inc., Prime Homes at Portofino Professional Center, LLC, Villa Portofino East Builders, Inc., The Falls of Portofino Builders, LLC, Villa Portofino East Commercial Builders, Inc., Villa Portofino West Commercial Builders, Inc., Portofino Village Builders, LLC, Portofino Village Commercial Builders, Inc., Portofino Cove Builders, Inc., Portofino Landings Builders, Inc., Portofino Landings Commercial Builders, LLC, Portofino Springs Builders, LLC, Portofino Preserve Builders, LLC, Portofino Vineyards Builders, LLC, Prime Homes at Portofino Plaza, LLC, Prime Homes at Portofino Plaza Retail, LLC, Universal Capital Fund, LLC, Prime Homes, Inc., Petitioners, v. Jeannette ABBO, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 12, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Sarafan and Michael L. Schuster of Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., Miami, for petitioners.

Terrence P. O'Connor of Morgan, Carratt and O'Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the April 29, 2015 order of the trial court, and remand for further proceedings. The challenged order found that petitioners had waived accountant-client privilege1 at an earlier, September 16, 2014 hearing. Such finding is facially erroneous because, at the time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases