1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.3d
  4. 139 So.3d
  5. 139 So.3d 489 (2014)
 

GILLESPIE v. McCOMBS

No. 4D12-2473.

139 So.3d 489 (2014)

Denise GILLESPIE, Appellant, v. James McCOMBS, Laura Bruno, Inez Willis and Michael Willis, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 4, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rafael A. Castro, III , Miami, for appellant.

Virginia P. Sherlock of Littman, Sherlock & Heims, P.A., Stuart, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Although the court's March 15, 2012 order was improper, we affirm on the tipsy coachman doctrine, which "allows an appellate court to affirm a trial court that `reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons' so long as `there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record.'" Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 906 (Fla.2002). Had the judge considered the third amended complaint, it would nonetheless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases