PER CURIAM.
The appeal taken by Appellant, Marcus Eugene Means, makes six arguments challenging his four convictions and sentences for grand theft auto (Count I); obtaining a vehicle with intent to defraud by trick or false representation (Count II); stopping payment on a check (Count III); and giving a false name or identification to a police officer (Count IV). We find no merit in four of Appellant's arguments and affirm without discussion. Appellant is
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
