PER CURIAM.
Herbert J.T. Wilson, II, appeals an order summarily denying his Motion to Return Property to Defendant. Because the motion was facially sufficient, the trial court was required to either conclusively refute the allegations or hold an evidentiary hearing. See Bailey v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.