PER CURIAM.
The appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by finding him competent to proceed with sentencing despite the uncontested testimony of two experts that he was incompetent. The State concedes error and asks this Court to remand for resentencing following a new competency hearing. See Gore v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.