1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.3d
  4. 121 So.3d
  5. 121 So.3d 433 (2013)
 

TRINIDAD v. FLORIDA PENINSULA INS. CO.

No. SC11-1643.

121 So.3d 433 (2013)

Amado TRINIDAD, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 3, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. , and Amy S. Farrior of Buell & Elligett, P.A., Tampa, FL; Kelly L. Kubiak of the Merlin Law Group, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Petitioner.

Scott A. Cole and Kristen A. Tajak of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, FL, for Respondent.

Adrian Neiman Arkin and Timothy H. Crutchfield of North Miami, FL, for Amicus Curiae United Policyholders.

PARIENTE, J.

The issue in this case concerns the scope of replacement cost insurance coverage under the applicable provisions of the 2008 Florida Statutes. In Trinidad v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Co., 99 So.3d 502, 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), the Third District Court of Appeal concluded that Florida Peninsula Insurance Company was not required by either its replacement cost homeowner's insurance policy or the applicable provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases