PER CURIAM.
The State challenges the dismissal of the information against Appellee. It contends the trial court erred in finding that it had committed a discovery violation by failing to retrieve and preserve a surveillance videotape from the retail store where Appellee had been arrested prior to the store erasing the tape. It argues that the tape was never in the government's possession, was not exculpatory, and there was no evidence of bad faith. We agree and reverse...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
