PER CURIAM.
The appellant filed a postconviction motion claiming that counts two through four, for which he received five-year sentences, were to be concurrently imposed to each other, and consecutively imposed to count one, for which he also received a five-year sentence. He claims his total sentence is for ten years' imprisonment. The state disagrees and argues that the appellant was sentenced to a total of 20 years' imprisonment, with each count, for which he received...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
