PER CURIAM.
In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, the former wife raises several points on appeal, only one of which warrants discussion. The former wife challenges the trial court's allocation to her of depleted assets that she used during the pendency of the dissolution proceeding to pay her attorney. In the absence of a finding of misconduct, it is error to include a depleted marital asset in the equitable distribution scheme. Austin v. Austin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.