PER CURIAM.
The defendant's petition alleges ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The petition raises four grounds. We grant the petition as to only the first ground. The first ground argues that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issue of whether the defendant's convictions for first degree grand theft and making a false insurance claim greater than $100,000, both allegedly stemming from the same action, violate double jeopardy.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
