1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.3d
  4. 89 So.3d
  5. 89 So.3d 1072 (2012)
 

TIFFORD v. LITIGATION CONCEPTS

Nos. 3D10-2045, 3D10-2044, 3D10-1277.

89 So.3d 1072 (2012)

ARTHUR W. TIFFORD, P.A., and Tifford and Tifford, P.A., Appellants, v. LITIGATION CONCEPTS, L.C., et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tifford and Tifford and Arthur Tifford , Miami, for appellants.

Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine and Alan Kluger and Terri Meyers , Miami, for appellees.

Before SUAREZ, ROTHENBERG and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, holding that the trial court properly entered final summary judgment in favor of appellees on appellants' claims for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. See Faro v. Romani, 641 So.2d 69, 71 (Fla.1994) (holding "when an attorney withdraws from representation upon his own volition, and the contingency has not occurred, the attorney forfeits all rights to compensation.").

We likewise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases