PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellant's motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and denying the motion for rehearing as untimely. Because the motion for rehearing was untimely, it did not toll the rendition of the final order for purposes of seeking this appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). This appeal is thus untimely and is DISMISSED. Gary v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.