PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the final judgment revoking his probation. Because the State relied exclusively on hearsay evidence to prove the violations of conditions one and three, and it failed to prove a willful violation of condition two, we reverse.
Appellant was accused of a violation of conditions one and three based on the factual allegation that he changed his residence without permission and falsely reported his residence to his probation officer...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
