PER CURIAM.
The sole issue in this appeal concerns whether, after ruling that Appellee is the biological father of the child born out of wedlock on March 31, 2004, to Appellant, the trial court erred in changing the child's legal surname at Appellee's request. We conclude the record lacks competent, substantial evidence establishing the name change is in the child's best interests. See Hutcheson v. Taylor,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.