1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.3d
  4. 52 So.3d
  5. 52 So.3d 843 (2011)
 

GIELCHINSKY v. POOL PEOPLE, INC.

No. 4D09-4391.

52 So.3d 843 (2011)

Robert GIELCHINSKY and Wendy Gielchinsky, Appellants, v. The POOL PEOPLE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 9, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byron G. Petersen of Byron G. Petersen P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Jeffrey B. Shalek of Phillips, Cantor & Shalek, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the circuit court's August 3, 2009 order dismissing the case for "lack of activity . . . pursuant to rule 1.420." Prior to dismissal, no notice contemplated by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) had been served. See, e.g., Fla. R. Civ. P. Form 1.989. Judge Padovano explains the mechanics of the rule:

As a prerequisite to filing a motion to dismiss under the rule, the defending party must serve notice on the claimant that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases