PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant's motion for return of property is affirmed for reasons other than those given by the trial court. Appellant's motion was facially insufficient. See Almeda v. State,
Affirmed.
MAY, CIKLIN and LEVINE...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.