PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
COPE, J. (concurring).
The appellant argues that the trial court's order regarding visitation was based on a misunderstanding of the facts. That may be so, but the transcript of the hearing indicates that the appellant did not clearly make this point at the hearing below. For that reason, I join in affirming the trial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.