PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the postconviction court's order denying his claim that his habitual felony offender sentence is illegal. The record does not contain the judgment and sentence and does not conclusively refute the appellant's claim. Therefore, we reverse and remand either for additional record portions that refute the appellant's claim, or further proceedings. See Thomas v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.