BLIZZARD v. APPLIANCE DIRECT, INC.

No. 5D08-4070.

16 So.3d 922 (2009)

Neina BLIZZARD, Appellant, v. APPLIANCE DIRECT, INC., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 7, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice Arcadier of Allen & Arcadier, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant.

Christopher J. Coleman and Karl W. Bohne, Jr., of Schillinger & Coleman, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee.


MONACO, C.J.

In this appeal we consider whether the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict during a trial in which the appellant, Neina Blizzard, sought damages against her former employer, Appliance Direct, Inc., for sexual harassment and retaliation in accordance with section 760.10, Florida Statutes. Because we conclude that there was sufficient evidence requiring that the case be submitted to the jury, we reverse.

At the times critical to this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases