PER CURIAM.
Aaron Marsh ("Marsh") petitions this Court for writs of prohibition and habeas corpus and asserts that he was not in lawful custody under the terms of the Jimmy Ryce Act when the State initiated commitment proceedings against him. Because we conclude that Marsh was in lawful custody when the State initiated the commitment process on April 19, 1999, we deny the petitions.
As the Florida Supreme Court stated in Larimore v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.