PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur; BENTON, J., concurs with opinion.
This case presents at least an arguable issue about whether appellant's resentencing comported with the prohibitions against double jeopardy. See Fasenmyer v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.