PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals the denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion arguing that his prison release reoffender (PRR) sentence imposed for robbery by sudden snatching is improper. A conviction for robbery by sudden snatching cannot subject the appellant to a PRR sentence. See Thomas v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.