CANO v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC.

No. 4D08-2108.

8 So.3d 408 (2009)

Daila CANO, Appellant, v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC., and Guillermo Cano, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 18, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron D. Radbil and Jeffrey Y. Spiegel of Krohn & Moss, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for appellant.

Danielle Robinson and William L. Bromagen of Bromagen & Rathet, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Hyundai Motor America, Inc.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment awarding attorney's fees and costs to the Appellee, Hyundai Motor America, Inc., pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. The Appellant, Daila Cano, contends that the award was improper because Hyundai's joint settlement offer failed to satisfy section 768.79 and rule 1.442's apportionment requirement. We agree and reverse.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases