Appellant raises several issues challenging his convictions and sentences for racketeering and procuring a person of less than 18 years of age for prostitution. We find only one has merit. Appellant asserts the trial court erred in imposing a lien of $27,068.93 for investigative costs without evidence from the State establishing the necessity of said costs. We agree. See Ortiz v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BAKER v. STATE
No. 1D07-3450.
4 So.3d 763 (2009)
Dallas Eugene BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 10, 2009.
March 10, 2009.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Dallas Baker, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
