PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals an order denying his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief and an order preventing him from any future filings. He argues that the trial court erred in finding his motion successive and untimely. We agree and reverse.
There is no doubt the defendant's multiple filings have confused the issue. The following is a chronology of the defendant's case.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
