PER CURIAM.
The appellant has appealed the trial court's order in which the court denied his facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion as successive. However, the trial court failed to attach the order relied upon to conclude that the instant motion is successive. We therefore reverse and remand the order for the trial court to attach the prior order which supports the summary denial of the appellant's claim or to otherwise address the merits of the appellant's claim...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
