PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Adrian Jammal Maddox, appeals the trial court's denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail credit. The trial court denied Maddox's motion without stating a reason or attaching any documents to refute Maddox's claim that he is entitled to additional jail credit. The State's response on appeal provides neither an adequate basis for the lower court's ruling nor those portions of the record that would refute Maddox's claim. Therefore...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
