PER CURIAM.
The appellant seeks review of the circuit court's order summarily denying several motions for postconviction relief. The denial of the appellant's first and third claims from his January 8, 2004, motion, and the claims in his June 18, 2004, June 21, 2006, and August 10, 2006, pleadings is affirmed without further discussion. The remaining claims in the January 8, 2004, motion were deemed facially insufficient and, in accordance with Spera v. State,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
