NATHAN v. BATES

No. 3D07-2684.

998 So.2d 1148 (2008)

Alan NATHAN, Suzan Barros, Stuart Nathan, Robert Nathan, Edna Nathan, Roxanne Lane, Daniel Blanco, Gregory Ricci and Gordon Cone, Appellants, v. Maurice BATES, a/k/a Alvinie Maurice Bates, III, d/b/a Bates Enterprises and Gold by God, et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 1, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan K. Marcus, for appellants.

Peter J. Yanowitch, Coral Gables; David D. Gordon and Richard Patrick, for appellees.

Before RAMIREZ, SHEPHERD, and SALTER, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Alan Nathan appeals the trial court's order dismissing with prejudice his complaint filed against appellees, Steve and Cheryl Floyd. We affirm because neither Nathan's complaint nor the Floyds' affidavits provided a basis for the trial court's jurisdiction.

The Floyds' affidavits conclusively demonstrate that they did not satisfy the Constitutional due process requirements for sufficient minimum contacts with this State. See Venetian Salami...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases