JIMENEZ v. ROOFLINE, INC.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00398-WBS-JDP.

CARLOS JIMENEZ and JUAN PINZON, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved employees pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA"); and MICHAEL MAGDALENO, as an aggrieved employee pursuant to PAGA, Plaintiffs, v. ROOFLINE, INC. dba ROOFLINE SUPPLY & DELIVERY, an Oregon corporation; SRS DISTRIBUTION INC., a Delaware corporation; J. B. WHOLESALE ROOFING AND BUILDING SUPPLIES, INC., a California corporation; BUILDERS SUPPLY LOGISTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

April 18, 2024.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT

ORDER ON STIPULATION

Based on the Parties' Stipulation to Remand Action to State Court and good cause appearing therefor, the Court orders as follows:

1. This action is remanded to the Superior Court of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases