1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 653 F.Supp.3d
  5. 653 F.Supp.3d 712 (2023)
 

AMEZCUA v. CRST EXPEDITED INC.

Case No. 4:22-cv-06501-YGR.

653 F.Supp.3d 712 (2023)

Ricardo AMEZCUA, Plaintiff, v. CRST EXPEDITED INC.; Gamino & Associates, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed January 31, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chaim Shaun Setareh , David Keledjian , Setareh Law Group, Beverly Hills, CA, for Plaintiff.

Ariella Kupetz , Kristen Jeannine Nesbit , Shaun Jordan Voigt , Fisher Phillips LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion to remand. For the reasons given herein, the Court finds removal based on the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2), was proper and denies the motion.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases