PEOPLE FOR ETH. TREAT. v. L.A. CTY. METRO. TRANS.

Case No. 2:21-cv-07662-SSS-MAAx.

646 F.Supp.3d 1201 (2022)

PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

Signed December 19, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew D. Strugar , Law Office of Matthew Strugar, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.

Charles Morton Safer , Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA, Dawyn Renae Harrison , Janice Lynn Kasai , Office of Los Angeles County Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Jennifer Mira Hashmall , Colin Rolfs , Nadia Ann Sarkis , Miller Barondess LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Edzyl Josef Gonzales Magante , Joseph P. Wohrle , William E. Weinberger , Parker Milliken Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian, a Prof. Corp, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. 47]

Before the Court is Plaintiff People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.'s ("PETA") Motion for Summary Judgment. [Dkt. 47]. Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("Metro") opposes and seeks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases