1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 628 F.Supp.3d
  5. 628 F.Supp.3d 996 (2022)
 

CAO LIGHTING, INC. v. SIGNIFY N.V.

Case No. 2:21-cv-08972-AB-SP.

628 F.Supp.3d 996 (2022)

CAO LIGHTING, INC., Plaintiff, v. SIGNIFY N.V. (f/k/a Philips Lighting N.V.), and Signify North America Corporation (f/k/a Philips Lighting North America Corporation), Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

Signed September 19, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth A. Gold , Roya Rahmanpour , Barnes and Thornburg LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Adam M. Kaufmann , Pro Hac Vice, Baenes and Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL, Heather B. Repicky , Pro Hac Vice, Ronald E. Cahill , Pro Hac Vice, Barnes and Thornburg LLP, Boston, MA, Jeffrey M. Barron , Pro Hac Vice, Todd G. Vare , Pro Hac Vice, Barnes and Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Jeffrey C. Morgan , Pro Hac Vice, Barnes and Thornburg LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff.

Jason M. Dorsky , Pro Hac Vice, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, John D. Carlin , Pro Hac Vice, Sean M. McCarthy , Pro Hac Vice, Venable LLP, New York, NY, Sarah S. Brooks , Venable LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant Signify North America Corporation.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SIGNIFY N.V.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (Dkt. No. 48)

Before the Court is Defendant Signify N.V.'s ("Defendant") Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases