BARRY v. STRYKER CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 20-1787-RGA.

DR. MARK A. BARRY, Plaintiff, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

February 3, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Regina S.E. Murphy , BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP, Wilmington, DE; D. Clay Holloway (argued), Mitchell G. Stockwell , Courtney S. Dabbiere (argued), KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Atlanta, GA; Dario A. Machleidt (argued), Christopher P. Damitio (argued), Kathleen R. Geyer , KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Seattle, WA; Taylor J. Pfingst , KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Andrew W. Rinehart , KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Winston-Salem, NC. Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Jeremy Tigan , Brian P. Egan , Cameron P. Clark , MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jonathan G. Graves , Joseph E. Van Tassel , COOLEY LLP, Reston, VA; Adam M. Pivovar (argued), COOLEY, LLP, Washington, DC; Alissa M. Wood , COOLEY LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Chad T. Nitta , Jason S. Jackson (argued), Heather N. Tilley , KUTAK ROCK, LLP, Denver, CO. Attorneys for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before me is the issue of claim construction of multiple terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,670,358 ("the '358 patent"), U.S. Patent No. 8,361,121 ("the '121 patent"), U. S . Patent No. 9,339,301 ("the '301 patent"), U.S. Patent No. 9,668,787 ("the '787 patent"), and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases