1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 640 F.Supp.3d
  5. 640 F.Supp.3d 365 (2022)
 

ROBOCAST, INC. v. NETFLIX, INC.

Civil Action No. 22-305-RGA.

640 F.Supp.3d 365 (2022)

ROBOCAST, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

Filed November 14, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen B. Brauerman , Ronald P. Golden, III , Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE, Andrew C. Ryan , Pro Hac Vice, Katherine M. Tassmer , Pro Hac Vice, Marc N. Henschke , Pro Hac Vice, Nicholas A. Geiger , Pro Hac Vice, Steven M. Coyle , Pro Hac Vice, Hartford, CT, Casey L. Shomaker , Pro Hac Vice, Dallas, TX, Steven J. Rizzi , Pro Hac Vice, New York, NY, Sara T. Colburn , Pro Hac Vice, for Plaintiff.

Kelly E. Farnan , Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE, Tara D. Elliott , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, Ashley M. Fry , Pro Hac Vice, Diane E. Ghrist , Pro Hac Vice, Rachel Weiner Cohen , Pro Hac Vice, Tiffany Chantel Weston , Pro Hac Vice, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM

Before me is Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (D.I. 11). The motion has been fully briefed and I have considered the parties' briefing. (D.I. 12, 18, 19). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases