INTERN. GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC v. GARLAND

C.A. No. 21-463 WES.

628 F.Supp.3d 393 (2022)

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC, and IGT Global Solutions Corp., Plaintiffs, v. Merrick B GARLAND and The United States Department of Justice, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.

Signed September 15, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Hay , Pro Hac Vice, Jonathan F. Cohn , Pro Hac Vice, Joshua Fougere , Pro Hac Vice, Madeleine Joseph , Pro Hac Vice, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, Mark N.G. Hichar , David C. Fixler , Greenberg Traurig, Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs.

Taisa M. Goodnature , DOJ-Civ, Washington, DC, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The substantive question of statutory interpretation at the center of this case — whether the Wire Act of 19611 reaches non-sports betting — has been definitively decided in the First Circuit. See N.H. Lottery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases