1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 591 F.Supp.3d
  5. 591 F.Supp.3d 638 (2022)
 

SONOS, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC

No. C 21-07559 WHA.

591 F.Supp.3d 638 (2022)

SONOS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed March 16, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cole B. Richter , Pro Hac Vice, David R. Grosby , Pro Hac Vice, Jae Y. Pak , Pro Hac Vice, Matthew J. Sampson, I , Michael P. Boyea , Pro Hac Vice, Cole Bradley Richter , George I. Lee , Pro Hac Vice, John Dan Smith, III , Pro Hac Vice, Rory Patrick Shea , Pro Hac Vice, Sean M. Sullivan , Pro Hac Vice, Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith LLP, Chicago, IL, Kristina DiBenedetto McKenna , Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe LLP, Boston, MA, Alyssa Caridis , Pro Hac Vice, Alyssa M. Caridis , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Bas de Blank , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Menlo Park, CA, Clement S. Roberts , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA, Clement Seth Roberts , Durie Tangri LLP, San Francsico, CA, Evan David Brewer , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Seattle, WA, Joseph Raymond Kolker , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, Mark D. Siegmund , Law Firm of Walt Fair, PLLC, Waco, TX, Jeffrey Lance Johnson , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff.

Charles K. Verhoeven , Jordan R. Jaffe , Lindsay M. Cooper , Pro Hac Vice, Melissa J. Baily , Pro Hac Vice, Lana Robins , Jocelyn, Ma , Lindsay Cooper , Charles Kramer Verhoeven , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Paige Arnette Amstutz , Scott, Douglass & McConnico, LLP, Austin, TX, Anne-Raphaelle Aubry , Pro Hac Vice, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Boston, MA, Marc L. Kaplan , Pro Hac Vice, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Chicago, IL, Nima Hefazi , Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS AND CERTIFICATION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)

INTRODUCTION

In this patent infringement action, alleged infringer moves to dismiss patent owner's enhanced damages and indirect infringement claims. To the following extent, the motion is GRANTED.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases