RUDY v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.

No. 21-CV-3575.

583 F.Supp.3d 1149 (2022)

Heather RUDY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

Signed February 4, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spencer Sheehan , Sheehan & Associates, P.C., Great Neck, NY, for Plaintiff.

Trent S. Dickey , Sills, Cummis & Gross, P.C., Newark, NJ, Christopher M. Miller , Cory D. Anderson , Rock Fusco & Connelly, LLC, Chicago, IL, Katherine Marguerite Lieb , Pro Hac Vice, Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., New York, NY, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This putative class action concerns the alleged deceptive labeling of snack almonds. Plaintiff Heather Rudy claims that Defendant Family Dollar Stores, Inc. ("Family Dollar") misled her and other consumers by marketing its Eatz brand

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases