AUTOMATIC EQUIPMENT MFG. v. DANKO MANUFACTURING

8:19-CV-162.

582 F.Supp.3d 649 (2022)

AUTOMATIC EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Nebraska company, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, and Creed-Monarch, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation, Intervenor Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant v. DANKO MANUFACTURING, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska.

Signed January 31, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian T. McKernan , Luke C. Holst , McGrath, North Law Firm, Omaha, NE, for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant.

Anthony L. Osborn , Gehling, Osborn Law Firm, Sioux City, IA, Mitchell McCarthy , Pro Hac Vice, Hall, Estill Law Firm — Oklahoma City, Oklahoma City, OK, Patrick D. Kuehl, Jr. , Rimon Law Firm, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

Arthur W. Fisher, III , Fisher Law Firm, Dunnellon, FL, Brian T. McKernan , Luke C. Hoist , McGrath, North Law Firm, Omaha, NE, John C. Stull , Carlton, Fields Law Firm, Tampa, FL, Robert M. DeLoach , Deloach Law Firm, Brandon, FL, for Intervenor Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

In this patent case, Defendant, the patent-holder, claims Plaintiffs infringed on its patent while Plaintiffs claim the patent was invalid because it was anticipated by earlier inventions. Following a trial in this matter, the jury returned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases