1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 555 F.Supp.3d
  5. 555 F.Supp.3d 889 (2021)
 

DOE v. TWITTER, INC.

Case No. 21-cv-00485-JCS.

555 F.Supp.3d 889 (2021)

John DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TWITTER, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed August 19, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christen Michelle Price , Pro Hac Vice, Peter A. Gentala , Pro Hac Vice, Benjamin Wyman Bull , Pro Hac Vice, Danielle M. Pinter , Pro Hac Vice, National Center on Sexual Exploitation, Washington, DC, Lisa D. Haba , Pro Hac Vice, The Haba Law Firm, PA, Longwood, FL, Paul Anthony Matiasic , Hannah E. Mohr , The Matiasic Firm, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff A Minor.

Hannah E. Mohr , Paul Anthony Matiasic , The Matiasic Firm, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff B.M.

Hannah E. Mohr , The Matiasic Firm, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff John Doe #2.

Michael Graham Rhodes , Kathleen R. Hartnett , Kyle Christopher Wong , Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jamie D. Robertson , Linh Khahn Nguyen , Cooley LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 48

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 allege that when they were thirteen years old they were solicited and recruited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases