IN RE ALUMINUM WAREHOUSING ANTITRUST LITIGATION

13 MD 2481 (PAE) 14 Civ. 3116 (PAE), 14 Civ. 211 (PAE), 14 Civ. 217 (PAE), 14 Civ. 6849 (PAE) 15 Civ. 8307 (PAE).

520 F.Supp.3d 455 (2021)

IN RE ALUMINUM WAREHOUSING ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: In re Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation (Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs), Agfa Corporation and AGFA Graphics, NV v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Mag Instrument, Inc. v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Eastman Kodak Company v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Fujifilm Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc. v. Goldman Sachs & Co.,

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Signed February 17, 2021.


OPINION & ORDER

Plaintiffs in these actions1 contend that defendants have violated section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, by conspiring to inflate prices in the primary-aluminum market.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases