ANDERSON v. APPLE INC.

Case No. 3:20-cv-02328-WHO.

500 F.Supp.3d 993 (2020)

Elaine ANDERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed November 16, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ben Michael Harrington , Hagens Berman , Shana E. Scarlett , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Berkeley, CA, Steve W. Berman , Thomas Eric Loeser , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Seattle, WA, Bradley Keith King , Christopher Eric Stiner , Theodore Walter Maya , Tina Wolfson , Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC, Burbank, CA, for Plaintiffs Elaine Anderson, Diana Atkins, Scott Burst, Beth Chavez, Colea Childs, Euihwan Cho, Alison Coleman, Victoria Cornwell, Donald Dahl, Jacqueline Demeritte, Candace Martino, Scott Sapkosky, Erik Villagran.

Bradley Keith King , Christopher Eric Stiner , Theodore Walter Maya , Tina Wolfson , Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC, Burbank, CA, Steve W. Berman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs Rhonda Mason, Daniel Aviles, Crystal Miller, Taylor Chanek, Matt Taylor, Bernadette Lionetta, Melissa Arellano, Kyle Kristoff, Pamela Vohringer, Michael Miller, Randall Knight, Christopher Adams, Kimberly Walker, Zachary Schwartz, Latecia Cushion Knight, Cuneyit Adiguzel, Jeffrey Messina, Bryan Riviello, Jabre Wise, Veronica Stovall, Rodney Weber, Christian Hunt, Simone Cox, Melanie Cobb, Nancy Prater, Sheila Claxton, Chasidy Dawson, David Kreamer, Beth Tomson, Melissa Lynn Brevig, Marlena Harrison, Wendy Sorrells, Timothy Downs, Deborah Morgan, Yvette Knox, Julie Rambousek, Denice Ryan, James Hines, Raven Shaw, Nicole Prichard, James Matos, Travis Rea, Oskar Villagomez, Mercedes Espinoza, Jennifer Pratt, Merlyn Johnson, Regina Ellison, Andrew Bewick, Robert Altmann, Lesley Villa, Cherie Brown, Pamela Paine, Nina Parker.

Steve W. Berman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff Amanda Fadler.

Arturo J. Gonzalez , Alexandria Armida Amezcua , Sabrina Larson , Tiffany Cheung , Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 32

INTRODUCTION

The 68 named plaintiffs in this proposed class action claim that defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") misled them about the capabilities of one of its smartphones, the iPhone XR. The iPhone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases