CALIFORNIA BY AND THROUGH BECERRA v. AZAR

Case No. 19-cv-02552-VC.

501 F.Supp.3d 830 (2020)

State of CALIFORNIA BY AND THROUGH Attorney General Xavier BECERRA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alex M. AZAR, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed November 17, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen Boergers , Nimrod Pitsker Elias , Anna Margaret Rich , California Department of Justice, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerm.

Margaret Q. Chapple , Attorney General of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, William Tong, for Plaintiff State of Connecticut.

Ellen F. Rosenblum , Jeanne Nicole DeFever , Oregon Dept. of Justice, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs State of Oregon, Kate Brown.

Cynthia Mark , Pro Hac Vice, Mass Office of Atty General, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Alicia O. Young , Pro Hac Vice, John Paul DesJardien , Pro Hac Vice, Washington State Office of the Attorney General Social and Health Services Olympia, Olympia, WA, Robert W. Ferguson, for Plaintiff State of Washington.

Elizabeth Morris , Pro Hac Vice, Office of the Illinois Attorney General, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff State of Illinois.

Sophie Kaiser , Carol Federighi , United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Rebekah Millard , Freedom Foundation, Olympia, WA, for Defendant Providers Bruckshaw, Joyner, Juvonen, Martin, Mendivil, Murphy, Sumner, Toussi, Velador, Wright.

Stacey Leyton , P. Casey Pitts , and Stefanie Wilson of Altshuler Berzon LLP represent all Plaintiff-Intervenors.

Nicole Berner and Renee Gerni of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) represent Plaintiff-Intervenor SEIU Local 503.

Judith Rivlin , Teague Patterson , and Fernando Colon of American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees represent Plaintiff-Intervenor United Domestic Workers of America, AFSCME Local 3930.


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 84, 85, 87, 89, 90, 91, 95, 105

As part of their Medicaid programs, states offer low-income and disabled residents the option of receiving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases