1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 476 F.Supp.3d
  5. 476 F.Supp.3d 978 (2020)
 

DOTSTRATEGY CO. v. TWITTER INC.

Case No. 19-cv-06176-CRB.

476 F.Supp.3d 978 (2020)

DOTSTRATEGY CO., Plaintiff, v. TWITTER INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed August 3, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solomon B. Cera, Thomas C. Bright, Cera LLP, San Francisco, CA, David A. Hodges, David Hodges Law Office, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff.

Benjamin Hansel Kleine, Whitty Somvichian, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey R. Roeser, Jennifer Haltom Doan, Haltom & Doan, LLP, Texarkana, TX, Lilia Roady Lopez, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

Twitter, Inc., promises advertisers on its platform that they will only be charged when "people" interact with the accounts or Tweets they are paying to promote. DotStrategy, Co., believes it was charged for interactions with automated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases