1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 473 F.Supp.3d
  5. 473 F.Supp.3d 1081 (2020)
 

WATCH v. CITY OF VACAVILLE

No. 2:17-cv-00524-KJM-KJN.

473 F.Supp.3d 1081 (2020)

CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF VACAVILLE, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Filed July 20, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Silver , Law Office of Jack Silver, Sebastopol, CA, David Jonathan Weinsoff , Law Office Of David J. Weinsoff, Fairfax, CA, for Plaintiff.

Gregory J. Newmark , Shiraz Tangri, Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER

In this case in which plaintiff California River Watch ("plaintiff" or "River Watch") alleges toxic contamination under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B), each party moves for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases