1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CARGILL INCORPORATED v. BINGENHEIMER
 

CARGILL INCORPORATED v. BINGENHEIMER

Case No. 17-CV-300.

CARGILL INCORPORATED, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. DAVID BINGENHEIMER, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

March 19, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1836(a)
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1836(a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cargill Incorporated, Plaintiff, represented by Danielle Harris , Cozen O'Connor, David J. Walton , Cozen O'Connor & Gary L. Gassman , Cozen O'Connor.

David Bingenheimer, Defendant, represented by William R. Rettko , Rettko Law Offices.

ORDER

Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment. Bingenheimer has moved for summary judgment on Cargill's claims of misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of state and federal law, breach of various duties, tortious interference with prospective economic relations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases