1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. NOETHTICH v. PROGRESS RAIL
 

NOETHTICH v. PROGRESS RAIL

No. 1:20-cv-00600-JPH-DLP.

JAMES E. NOETHTICH, JR., Plaintiff, v. PROGRESS RAIL, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

March 19, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JAMES E. NOETHTICH, JR., Plaintiff, pro se.

PROGRESS RAIL, Defendant, represented by Jan S. Michelsen , OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, P.C..

ORDER

I. Granting in forma pauperis status

Mr. Noethtich's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. [2], is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). While in forma pauperis status allows Mr. Noethtich to proceed without prepaying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases