OLIVER v. LYFT, INC.

No. CV419-125.

ANTHONY OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. LYFT, INC. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division.

March 6, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony A Oliver, Plaintiff, pro se.

Lyft, Inc., Defendant, represented by Daniel P. Hart , Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Daniel Paul Hart , Seyfarth Shaw LLP & Kerry McCoy Friedrichs , Seyfarth Shaw LLP.


ORDER

The district judge adopted the undersigned's recommendation that pro se plaintiff Anthony Oliver's filings in this case—and any other case he files—be restricted, due to the vexatious character of his litigation. See doc. 56. Oliver appealed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases